Core i3-1220P vs Ryzen 3 3200U
Description
The i3-1220P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1220P gets a score of 404.7 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1220P is 6.6 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1220P gets a score of 404.7 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1220P is 6.6 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
810f81
Core
Alder Lake-P
Picasso
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
10/12
2/4
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280/2x2048 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2022
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
81.92k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
404.74k points
61.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1220P
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
11.13k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
19.6k
19.38k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.99k
4.47k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.9k
3.87k (x0.33)
TOTAL
81.92k
38.85k (x0.47)
Multithread
i3-1220P
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
178.85k
17.13k (x0.1)
Test#2 (FP)
153.82k
30.56k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
9.44k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.69k
4.09k (x1.52)
TOTAL
404.74k
61.23k (x0.15)
Performance/W
i3-1220P
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6387 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5494 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2478 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
14455 points/W
4082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1220P
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
8506 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4455 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2953 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2704 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
18618 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4