Core i3-1215U vs Xeon X5675
Description
The i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 148.3 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.2 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 148.3 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.2 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
206c2
Core
Alder Lake-H
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6/8
6 /12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2022
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
124.92k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1215U
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
20.87k
8.77k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
20.74k
5.82k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.32k
3.47k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.32k
2.98k (x0.36)
TOTAL
61.26k
21.04k (x0.34)
Multithread
i3-1215U
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
45.12k
53.23k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
60.59k
39.35k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.48k
27.05k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.06k
5.28k (x0.38)
TOTAL
148.26k
124.92k (x0.84)
Performance/W
i3-1215U
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
3008 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4040 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1899 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
937 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
9884 points/W
1315 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
4743 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4714 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2573 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1891 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
13922 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4