Core i3-1215U vs Xeon E5-1620 v2
Description
The i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-1620 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 129.6 k points while the E5-1620 v2 gets 144.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1620 v2 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 129.6 k points while the E5-1620 v2 gets 144.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1620 v2 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
306e4
Core
Alder Lake-H
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
6/8
4 /8
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
10240 kB
Date
April 2022
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
34.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
144.57k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1215U
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
12.55k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
20.2k
12.14k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.94k
4.83k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
4.85k (x0.6)
TOTAL
53.83k
34.37k (x0.64)
Multithread
i3-1215U
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
35.72k
51.93k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
56.41k
56.7k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25k
23.81k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.48k
12.14k (x0.97)
TOTAL
129.6k
144.57k (x1.12)
Performance/W
i3-1215U
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2381 points/W
399 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3761 points/W
436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1667 points/W
183 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
832 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
8640 points/W
1112 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3553 points/GHz
3217 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4591 points/GHz
3113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2260 points/GHz
1238 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1832 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
TOTAL
12234 points/GHz
8812 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4