Core i3-1215U vs Xeon E3-1270 v2
Description
The i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E3-1270 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 129.6 k points while the E3-1270 v2 gets 139.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1270 v2 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 129.6 k points while the E3-1270 v2 gets 139.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1270 v2 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
306a9
Core
Alder Lake-H
Ivy Bridge-H2
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
6/8
4 /8
TDP
15 W
69 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2022
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
36.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
139.38k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1215U
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
13.16k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
20.2k
12.51k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.94k
5k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
5.62k (x0.7)
TOTAL
53.83k
36.29k (x0.67)
Multithread
i3-1215U
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
35.72k
51.89k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
56.41k
57.35k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25k
23.74k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.48k
6.4k (x0.51)
TOTAL
129.6k
139.38k (x1.08)
Performance/W
i3-1215U
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2381 points/W
752 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3761 points/W
831 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1667 points/W
344 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
832 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
8640 points/W
2020 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3553 points/GHz
3374 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4591 points/GHz
3207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2260 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1832 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
12234 points/GHz
9304 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4