| | | | | | |

Core i3-1215U vs i5-10400F


Description
The i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
a0653
Core
Alder Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1215U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6.95k
4.3k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
16.28k
16.56k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.49k
5.25k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.95k
12.61k (x1.27)
TOTAL
43.67k
38.72k (x0.89)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
14.97k
18.1k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
51.01k
79.16k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.47k
26.75k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.59k
13.81k (x1.61)
TOTAL
105.05k
137.82k (x1.31)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
37.56k
26.28k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
21.13k
23.38k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.35k
5.52k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.31k
12.96k (x1.26)
TOTAL
80.34k
68.14k (x0.85)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
73.97k
163.67k (x2.21)
Test#2 (FP)
72.37k
159.74k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.61k
39k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.65k
7.56k (x0.78)
TOTAL
185.6k
369.97k (x1.99)

Performance/W
i3-1215U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4931 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4825 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
12374 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
8535 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2579 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2343 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
18258 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4