| | | | | | |

Core i3-1215U vs i5-10300H


Description
The i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.3 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
a0652
Core
Alder Lake-H
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
15.65k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
20.2k
23.13k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.94k
5.66k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
11.43k (x1.42)
TOTAL
53.83k
55.87k (x1.04)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
35.72k
26.77k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
56.41k
43.81k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25k
10.17k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.48k
11.91k (x0.95)
TOTAL
129.6k
92.66k (x0.71)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
37.56k
27.14k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
21.13k
24.75k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.35k
5.73k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.31k
11.84k (x1.15)
TOTAL
80.34k
69.47k (x0.86)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
73.97k
105.77k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
72.37k
107.47k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.61k
24.82k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.65k
8.02k (x0.83)
TOTAL
185.6k
246.07k (x1.33)

Performance/W
i3-1215U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
4931 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4825 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
12374 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
8535 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2579 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2343 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
18258 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4