| | | | | | |

Core i3-1215U vs i5-10210U


Description
The i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
806ec
Core
Alder Lake-H
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2022
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
145.51k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
37.56k
23.11k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
21.13k
20.58k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.35k
4.73k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.31k
7.43k (x0.72)
TOTAL
80.34k
55.86k (x0.7)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
73.97k
65.84k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
72.37k
60.77k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.61k
14.45k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.65k
4.44k (x0.46)
TOTAL
185.6k
145.51k (x0.78)

Performance/W
i3-1215U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
4931 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4825 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
12374 points/W
9701 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
8535 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2579 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2343 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
18258 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4