| | | | | | |

Core i3-1215U vs Ryzen 9 7945HX


Description
The i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7945HX is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the 7945HX gets 1313.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 7945HX is 7.1 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
a60f12
Core
Alder Lake-H
Dragon Range
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA-FL1
Cores/Threads
6/8
16/32
TDP
15 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
65536 kB
Date
April 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
113.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
1313.94k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1215U
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
37.56k
37.43k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
21.13k
30.7k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.35k
15.16k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.31k
29.78k (x2.89)
TOTAL
80.34k
113.07k (x1.41)

Multithread

i3-1215U

7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
73.97k
556.68k (x7.53)
Test#2 (FP)
72.37k
482.32k (x6.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.61k
225.46k (x7.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.65k
49.48k (x5.13)
TOTAL
185.6k
1313.94k (x7.08)

Performance/W
i3-1215U
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
4931 points/W
10121 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4825 points/W
8770 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
4099 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/W
900 points/W
TOTAL
12374 points/W
23890 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
8535 points/GHz
6932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/GHz
5685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2579 points/GHz
2807 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2343 points/GHz
5515 points/GHz
TOTAL
18258 points/GHz
20939 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4