Core i3-1215U vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.8 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.8 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
800f82
Core
Alder Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1215U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
37.56k
15.75k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
21.13k
26.29k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.35k
5.91k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.31k
18.48k (x1.79)
TOTAL
80.34k
66.44k (x0.83)
Multithread
i3-1215U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
73.97k
94.49k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
72.37k
182.53k (x2.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.61k
45.95k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.65k
10.15k (x1.05)
TOTAL
185.6k
333.12k (x1.79)
Performance/W
i3-1215U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4931 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4825 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
12374 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
8535 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2579 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2343 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
18258 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4