| | | | | | |

Core i3-1215U vs i5-12400F


Description
Both models i3-1215U and i5-12400F are based on Alder Lake architecture.

Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.2 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
90675
Core
Alder Lake-H
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
399.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1215U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6.95k
7.43k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
16.28k
18.64k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.49k
13.15k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.95k
14.82k (x1.49)
TOTAL
43.67k
54.04k (x1.24)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
14.97k
36.23k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
51.01k
134.76k (x2.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.47k
84.06k (x2.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.59k
16.71k (x1.95)
TOTAL
105.05k
271.76k (x2.59)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
20.87k
24.18k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
20.74k
23.85k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.32k
14.42k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.32k
14.87k (x1.79)
TOTAL
61.26k
77.32k (x1.26)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
45.12k
122.98k (x2.73)
Test#2 (FP)
60.59k
168.77k (x2.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.48k
96.11k (x3.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.06k
16.32k (x1.16)
TOTAL
148.26k
404.19k (x2.73)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
24.24k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
20.2k
24.74k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.94k
13.95k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
14.47k (x1.8)
TOTAL
53.83k
77.41k (x1.44)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
35.72k
126.87k (x3.55)
Test#2 (FP)
56.41k
186.48k (x3.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25k
92.37k (x3.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.48k
15.45k (x1.24)
TOTAL
129.6k
421.18k (x3.25)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
37.56k
33.85k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
21.13k
20.33k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.35k
10.51k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.31k
11.77k (x1.14)
TOTAL
80.34k
76.46k (x0.95)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
73.97k
174.21k (x2.36)
Test#2 (FP)
72.37k
141.31k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.61k
64.86k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.65k
19.01k (x1.97)
TOTAL
185.6k
399.39k (x2.15)

Performance/W
i3-1215U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4931 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4825 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
12374 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
8535 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2579 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2343 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
18258 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4