| | | | | | |

Core i3-1215U vs i7-1185G7


Description
The i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1185G7 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
806c1
Core
Alder Lake-H
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2022
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
60.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
230.91k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
37.56k
24.35k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
21.13k
20.07k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.35k
8.61k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.31k
7.84k (x0.76)
TOTAL
80.34k
60.87k (x0.76)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
73.97k
93.58k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
72.37k
94.71k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.61k
33.28k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.65k
9.34k (x0.97)
TOTAL
185.6k
230.91k (x1.24)

Performance/W
i3-1215U
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4931 points/W
3342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4825 points/W
3383 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/W
334 points/W
TOTAL
12374 points/W
8247 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
8535 points/GHz
5074 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/GHz
4182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2579 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2343 points/GHz
1633 points/GHz
TOTAL
18258 points/GHz
12682 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4