| | | | | | |

Core i3-1215U vs i7-11700F


Description
The i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 2.8 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
a0671
Core
Alder Lake-H
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2022
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
512.32k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1215U
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
37.56k
32.55k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
21.13k
26.95k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.35k
10.76k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.31k
19.32k (x1.87)
TOTAL
80.34k
89.58k (x1.12)

Multithread

i3-1215U

i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
73.97k
232.06k (x3.14)
Test#2 (FP)
72.37k
203.56k (x2.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.61k
72.89k (x2.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.65k
3.81k (x0.39)
TOTAL
185.6k
512.32k (x2.76)

Performance/W
i3-1215U
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
4931 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4825 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
12374 points/W
7882 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
8535 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2579 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2343 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
18258 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4