| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100T vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.2 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
50654
Core
Alder Lake-S
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2022
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-12100T
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
6.88k
3k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
12.29k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.26k
3.64k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.49k
6.55k (x0.49)
TOTAL
49.98k
25.46k (x0.51)

Multithread

i3-12100T

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
22.03k
20.42k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
84.16k
95.83k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.49k
30.88k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
9.7k (x1.08)
TOTAL
161.65k
156.83k (x0.97)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
18.78k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
16.25k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
3.99k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
6.8k (x0.49)
TOTAL
93.54k
45.82k (x0.49)

Multithread

i3-12100T

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
133.55k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
108.43k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
30.02k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
9.48k (x1.09)
TOTAL
330.62k
281.48k (x0.85)

Performance/W
i3-12100T
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4