Core i3-12100T vs Xeon X5670
Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 242.8 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 2.1 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 242.8 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 2.1 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
206c2
Core
Alder Lake-S
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
6 /6
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
115.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-12100T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
22.39k
8.35k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
5.58k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.37k
3.32k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.72k
3k (x0.22)
TOTAL
71.76k
20.26k (x0.28)
Multithread
i3-12100T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
76.69k
49.72k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
104.06k
35.19k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
21.88k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
8.6k (x0.97)
TOTAL
242.81k
115.4k (x0.48)
Performance/W
i3-12100T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
2191 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2973 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1520 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
253 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
6937 points/W
1215 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
5461 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3260 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3347 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
17503 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4