Core i3-12100T vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
306f2
Core
Alder Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
35 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
452.9k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-12100T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6.88k
3.52k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
8.68k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.26k
2.83k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.49k
3.13k (x0.23)
TOTAL
49.98k
18.17k (x0.36)
Multithread
i3-12100T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22.03k
32.7k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
84.16k
105.18k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.49k
35.18k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
9.54k (x1.06)
TOTAL
161.65k
182.59k (x1.13)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-12100T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22.39k
11.08k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
9.57k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.37k
3.18k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.72k
3.28k (x0.24)
TOTAL
71.76k
27.11k (x0.38)
Multithread
i3-12100T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
76.69k
139.07k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
104.06k
133.47k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
46.6k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
6.65k (x0.75)
TOTAL
242.81k
325.78k (x1.34)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-12100T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22.25k
11.18k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
23.16k
10.06k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.09k
3.21k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.21k
3.12k (x0.24)
TOTAL
71.7k
27.57k (x0.38)
Multithread
i3-12100T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
77.43k
140.98k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
109.08k
145.37k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.45k
45.62k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
6.75k (x0.77)
TOTAL
247.71k
338.73k (x1.37)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
18.62k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
10.49k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
4.04k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
3.26k (x0.24)
TOTAL
93.54k
36.41k (x0.39)
Multithread
i3-12100T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
236.25k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
151.05k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
58.9k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
6.7k (x0.77)
TOTAL
330.62k
452.9k (x1.37)
Performance/W
i3-12100T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
3774 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4