| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100T vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
306f2
Core
Alder Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
343.64k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-12100T
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22.25k
13.1k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
23.16k
11.91k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.09k
4.83k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.21k
3.83k (x0.29)
TOTAL
71.7k
33.68k (x0.47)

Multithread

i3-12100T

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
77.43k
105.42k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
109.08k
109.99k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.45k
44.56k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
17.7k (x2.02)
TOTAL
247.71k
277.66k (x1.12)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
20.99k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
11.9k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
4.72k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
3.75k (x0.27)
TOTAL
93.54k
41.36k (x0.44)

Multithread

i3-12100T

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
172.62k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
110.03k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
44.06k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
16.93k (x1.94)
TOTAL
330.62k
343.64k (x1.04)

Performance/W
i3-12100T
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4