| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100T vs E5-2620 v3


Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
306f2
Core
Alder Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
15360 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
35.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
357.99k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
18.64k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
10.55k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
4.12k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
2.54k (x0.18)
TOTAL
93.54k
35.86k (x0.38)

Multithread

i3-12100T

E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
181.66k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
122.09k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
47.02k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
7.22k (x0.83)
TOTAL
330.62k
357.99k (x1.08)

Performance/W
i3-12100T
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
2137 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
1436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
4212 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
5826 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
3297 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
1288 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
794 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
11205 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4