Core i3-12100T vs Xeon E5-2620
Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 247.7 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2620. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 247.7 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2620. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
206d7
Core
Alder Lake-S
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
15360 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
18.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
224.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-12100T
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
22.25k
6.95k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
23.16k
6.24k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.09k
3.05k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.21k
2.56k (x0.19)
TOTAL
71.7k
18.8k (x0.26)
Multithread
i3-12100T
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
77.43k
90.01k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
109.08k
82.43k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.45k
42.59k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
9.66k (x1.1)
TOTAL
247.71k
224.7k (x0.91)
Performance/W
i3-12100T
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
2212 points/W
948 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3117 points/W
868 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1499 points/W
448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
250 points/W
102 points/W
TOTAL
7077 points/W
2365 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
5426 points/GHz
2780 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5649 points/GHz
2494 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3192 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3222 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
TOTAL
17489 points/GHz
7519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4