| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100T vs i9-9900K


Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.6 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
906ed
Core
Alder Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
81.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
529.32k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-12100T
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6.88k
5k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
20.22k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.26k
6.54k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.49k
13.78k (x1.02)
TOTAL
49.98k
45.53k (x0.91)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.03k
36.39k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
84.16k
166.55k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.49k
54.92k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
8.96k (x1)
TOTAL
161.65k
266.82k (x1.65)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.39k
18.03k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
25.98k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.37k
6.86k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.72k
14.5k (x1.06)
TOTAL
71.76k
65.37k (x0.91)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
76.69k
131.34k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
104.06k
204.76k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
55.74k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
8.99k (x1.01)
TOTAL
242.81k
400.83k (x1.65)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.25k
17.98k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
23.16k
27.04k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.09k
6.63k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.21k
13.6k (x1.03)
TOTAL
71.7k
65.24k (x0.91)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
77.43k
130.88k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
109.08k
208.5k (x1.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.45k
54.12k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
8.91k (x1.02)
TOTAL
247.71k
402.41k (x1.62)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
32.08k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
28.17k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
6.68k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
14.98k (x1.08)
TOTAL
93.54k
81.91k (x0.88)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
242.98k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
220.16k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
53.97k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
12.22k (x1.4)
TOTAL
330.62k
529.32k (x1.6)

Performance/W
i3-12100T
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
2558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
2317 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
568 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
5572 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
6417 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5634 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
16382 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4