| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100T vs i9-10900K


Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 2.1 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
a0655
Core
Alder Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/20
TDP
35 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
80.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
685.65k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.39k
19.5k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
28.01k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.37k
7.45k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.72k
15.82k (x1.15)
TOTAL
71.76k
70.79k (x0.99)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
76.69k
194.49k (x2.54)
Test#2 (FP)
104.06k
312.59k (x3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
89.14k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
12.58k (x1.42)
TOTAL
242.81k
608.81k (x2.51)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
32.67k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
28.49k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
6.53k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
12.72k (x0.92)
TOTAL
93.54k
80.41k (x0.86)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
307.39k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
298.47k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
72.94k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
6.85k (x0.78)
TOTAL
330.62k
685.65k (x2.07)

Performance/W
i3-12100T
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
5485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
6282 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5479 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
2445 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
15463 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4