Core i3-12100T vs i7-8086K
Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-8086K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the i7-8086K gets 352.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8086K is 1.1 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the i7-8086K gets 352.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8086K is 1.1 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
906ea
Core
Alder Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
June 2018
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
72.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
352.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
28.74k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
25.31k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
5.78k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
13.12k (x0.95)
TOTAL
93.54k
72.95k (x0.78)
Multithread
i3-12100T
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
160.53k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
147.29k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
35.65k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
8.92k (x1.02)
TOTAL
330.62k
352.4k (x1.07)
Performance/W
i3-12100T
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
1690 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
1550 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
375 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
3709 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5063 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
1156 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
2624 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
14590 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4