| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100T vs i7-10750H


Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.1 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
a0652
Core
Alder Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
349.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-12100T
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6.88k
4.69k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
18.71k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.26k
5.84k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.49k
13.95k (x1.03)
TOTAL
49.98k
43.19k (x0.86)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.03k
18.79k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
84.16k
86.1k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.49k
27.42k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
5.27k (x0.59)
TOTAL
161.65k
137.58k (x0.85)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.39k
16.63k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
24.17k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.37k
6.38k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.72k
13.69k (x1)
TOTAL
71.76k
60.87k (x0.85)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
76.69k
67.07k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
104.06k
107.95k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
27.05k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
5.07k (x0.57)
TOTAL
242.81k
207.14k (x0.85)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.25k
16.71k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
23.16k
25.45k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.09k
6.06k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.21k
13.2k (x1)
TOTAL
71.7k
61.43k (x0.86)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
77.43k
67.59k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
109.08k
111.94k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.45k
27.7k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
5.3k (x0.61)
TOTAL
247.71k
212.53k (x0.86)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
29.06k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
26.49k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
6.23k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
13.89k (x1)
TOTAL
93.54k
75.67k (x0.81)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
154.61k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
151.34k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
36.33k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
6.93k (x0.79)
TOTAL
330.62k
349.21k (x1.06)

Performance/W
i3-12100T
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
7760 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4