| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100T vs i5-9500


Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
906ea
Core
Alder Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
73.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
352.84k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
6.88k
4.45k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
18.43k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.26k
5.84k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.49k
12.63k (x0.94)
TOTAL
49.98k
41.34k (x0.83)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
22.03k
24.75k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
84.16k
103.1k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.49k
32.43k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
5.56k (x0.62)
TOTAL
161.65k
165.85k (x1.03)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
22.39k
16.06k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
23.19k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.37k
6.1k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.72k
12.79k (x0.93)
TOTAL
71.76k
58.14k (x0.81)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
76.69k
90.44k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
104.06k
131.23k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
33.85k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
5.59k (x0.63)
TOTAL
242.81k
261.11k (x1.08)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
22.25k
16.14k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
23.16k
24.18k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.09k
5.87k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.21k
12.5k (x0.95)
TOTAL
71.7k
58.69k (x0.82)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
77.43k
92.21k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
109.08k
137.92k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.45k
33.12k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
5.56k (x0.64)
TOTAL
247.71k
268.8k (x1.09)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
29.17k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
25.49k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
5.84k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
13.15k (x0.95)
TOTAL
93.54k
73.65k (x0.79)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
166.66k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
146.9k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
34.04k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
5.25k (x0.6)
TOTAL
330.62k
352.84k (x1.07)

Performance/W
i3-12100T
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
2564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
524 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
5428 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
6629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
2990 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
16739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4