Core i3-12100T vs i5-9400F
Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-9400F is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the i5-9400F gets 331.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the i5-9400F gets 331.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
906ea
Core
Alder Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
67.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
331.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
27.15k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
23.63k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
5.38k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
11.61k (x0.84)
TOTAL
93.54k
67.77k (x0.72)
Multithread
i3-12100T
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
156.61k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
138k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
29.45k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
7.14k (x0.82)
TOTAL
330.62k
331.19k (x1)
Performance/W
i3-12100T
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
2409 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
2123 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
5095 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
6622 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5763 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
2831 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
16528 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4