| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100T vs i5-10500T


Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
a0653
Core
Alder Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
302.13k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.88k
3.87k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
15.79k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.26k
5.1k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.49k
12.13k (x0.9)
TOTAL
49.98k
36.89k (x0.74)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.03k
22.17k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
84.16k
101.79k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.49k
34.13k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
3.74k (x0.42)
TOTAL
161.65k
161.83k (x1)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.39k
13.94k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
20.01k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.37k
5.34k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.72k
11.41k (x0.83)
TOTAL
71.76k
50.7k (x0.71)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
76.69k
82.18k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
104.06k
124.23k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
35.6k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
3.73k (x0.42)
TOTAL
242.81k
245.75k (x1.01)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.25k
14.01k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
23.16k
21.17k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.09k
5.21k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.21k
11.42k (x0.86)
TOTAL
71.7k
51.82k (x0.72)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
77.43k
82.38k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
109.08k
115.64k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.45k
32.22k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
3.71k (x0.42)
TOTAL
247.71k
233.94k (x0.94)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
25.16k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
22.28k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
5.18k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
11.97k (x0.86)
TOTAL
93.54k
64.6k (x0.69)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
144.86k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
120.98k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
32.55k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
3.73k (x0.43)
TOTAL
330.62k
302.13k (x0.91)

Performance/W
i3-12100T
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
8632 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4