| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100T vs i5-10400T


Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
a0653
Core
Alder Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
307.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.88k
4k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
14.19k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.26k
4.62k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.49k
11.03k (x0.82)
TOTAL
49.98k
33.84k (x0.68)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.03k
22.77k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
84.16k
96.59k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.49k
31.65k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
2.45k (x0.27)
TOTAL
161.65k
153.46k (x0.95)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.39k
12.61k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
17.94k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.37k
4.83k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.72k
10.81k (x0.79)
TOTAL
71.76k
46.19k (x0.64)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
76.69k
74.62k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
104.06k
119.63k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
32.65k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
2.52k (x0.28)
TOTAL
242.81k
229.42k (x0.94)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.25k
12.5k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
23.16k
19.05k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.09k
4.72k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.21k
10.3k (x0.78)
TOTAL
71.7k
46.57k (x0.65)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
77.43k
74.58k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
109.08k
126.96k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.45k
31.76k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
2.5k (x0.29)
TOTAL
247.71k
235.8k (x0.95)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
22k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
19.98k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
4.57k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
11.31k (x0.81)
TOTAL
93.54k
57.85k (x0.62)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
136.69k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
135.25k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
32.76k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
2.48k (x0.28)
TOTAL
330.62k
307.18k (x0.93)

Performance/W
i3-12100T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
8776 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4