| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100T vs i5-10400F


Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
a0653
Core
Alder Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6.88k
4.3k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
16.56k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.26k
5.25k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.49k
12.61k (x0.94)
TOTAL
49.98k
38.72k (x0.77)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.03k
18.1k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
84.16k
79.16k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.49k
26.75k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
13.81k (x1.54)
TOTAL
161.65k
137.82k (x0.85)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
26.28k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
23.38k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
5.52k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
12.96k (x0.93)
TOTAL
93.54k
68.14k (x0.73)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
163.67k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
159.74k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
39k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
7.56k (x0.87)
TOTAL
330.62k
369.97k (x1.12)

Performance/W
i3-12100T
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4