Core i3-12100T vs i5-10200H
Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
a0652
Core
Alder Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
260.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
26.37k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
23.91k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
5.57k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
11.68k (x0.84)
TOTAL
93.54k
67.53k (x0.72)
Multithread
i3-12100T
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
114.08k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
114.71k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
27.33k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
4.25k (x0.49)
TOTAL
330.62k
260.38k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i3-12100T
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
7439 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4