| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100T vs i3-9100


Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the i3-9100 gets 229.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.4 times faster than the i3-9100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
906eb
Core
Alder Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
66.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
229.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-12100T
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
6.88k
4.3k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
17.79k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.26k
5.58k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.49k
8.86k (x0.66)
TOTAL
49.98k
36.53k (x0.73)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
22.03k
15.99k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
84.16k
66.31k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.49k
20.75k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
4.44k (x0.5)
TOTAL
161.65k
107.49k (x0.66)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
22.39k
15.53k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
22.21k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.37k
5.79k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.72k
8.31k (x0.61)
TOTAL
71.76k
51.84k (x0.72)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
76.69k
58.56k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
104.06k
86.17k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
22.4k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
4.55k (x0.51)
TOTAL
242.81k
171.69k (x0.71)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
22.25k
14.81k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
23.16k
22.15k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.09k
5.42k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.21k
4.8k (x0.36)
TOTAL
71.7k
47.17k (x0.66)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
77.43k
52.08k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
109.08k
87.45k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.45k
20.98k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
4.24k (x0.48)
TOTAL
247.71k
164.75k (x0.67)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
28.03k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
24.5k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
5.73k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
8.48k (x0.61)
TOTAL
93.54k
66.74k (x0.71)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
107.5k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
95.11k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
22.02k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
4.57k (x0.52)
TOTAL
330.62k
229.2k (x0.69)

Performance/W
i3-12100T
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
1654 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
1463 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
70 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
3526 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
6675 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5833 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
2018 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
15891 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4