Core i3-12100T vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5900HX is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the 5900HX gets 421.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HX is 1.3 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the 5900HX gets 421.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HX is 1.3 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
a50f00
Core
Alder Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
85.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
421.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
23.29k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
25.89k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
11.75k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
24.83k (x1.79)
TOTAL
93.54k
85.76k (x0.92)
Multithread
i3-12100T
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
138.16k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
192.12k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
80.84k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
9.93k (x1.14)
TOTAL
330.62k
421.05k (x1.27)
Performance/W
i3-12100T
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
3070 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
4269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
1796 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
221 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
9357 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
5064 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5628 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
5398 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
18644 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4