Core i3-12100T vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.3 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.3 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
a50f00
Core
Alder Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
434.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
21.2k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
25k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
11.44k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
24.22k (x1.75)
TOTAL
93.54k
81.87k (x0.88)
Multithread
i3-12100T
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
145.13k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
198.36k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
85.67k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
5.79k (x0.66)
TOTAL
330.62k
434.96k (x1.32)
Performance/W
i3-12100T
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
12427 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4