| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100T vs Ryzen 7 5700G


Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5700G is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the 5700G gets 484.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700G is 1.5 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
a50f00
Core
Alder Lake-S
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
84.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
484.11k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
22.99k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
25.24k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
11.56k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
24.7k (x1.78)
TOTAL
93.54k
84.49k (x0.9)

Multithread

i3-12100T

5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
159.36k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
215.57k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
98.78k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
10.4k (x1.19)
TOTAL
330.62k
484.11k (x1.46)

Performance/W
i3-12100T
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
2452 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
3316 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
1520 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
7448 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
4998 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5487 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
2513 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
5369 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
18367 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4