Core i3-12100T vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.7 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.7 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
810f81
Core
Alder Lake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2022
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
14.58k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
23.98k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
5.35k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
6.34k (x0.46)
TOTAL
93.54k
50.25k (x0.54)
Multithread
i3-12100T
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
57.37k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
107.03k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
28.9k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
7.05k (x0.81)
TOTAL
330.62k
200.34k (x0.61)
Performance/W
i3-12100T
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4