| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100T vs i3-13100F


Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.2 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
b06f5
Core
Alder Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
47.14k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
25.77k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
13.25k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
14.77k (x1.06)
TOTAL
93.54k
100.94k (x1.08)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
168.51k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
142.8k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
63.57k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
15.34k (x1.76)
TOTAL
330.62k
390.23k (x1.18)

Performance/W
i3-12100T
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4