| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100T vs i5-11300H


Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.2 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
806c1
Core
Alder Lake-S
Tiger Lake H35
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
285.75k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
25.83k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
23.56k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
9.2k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
5.06k (x0.36)
TOTAL
93.54k
63.64k (x0.68)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
116.87k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
121.08k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
41.8k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
6k (x0.69)
TOTAL
330.62k
285.75k (x0.86)

Performance/W
i3-12100T
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
8164 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4