| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100T vs i3-1115G4


Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 2.4 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
806c1
Core
Alder Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-12100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6.88k
3.75k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
17.22k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.26k
9.79k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.49k
8.21k (x0.61)
TOTAL
49.98k
38.97k (x0.78)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.03k
9.19k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
84.16k
35.47k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.49k
19.14k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
5.82k (x0.65)
TOTAL
161.65k
69.62k (x0.43)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.39k
12.9k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
21.4k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.37k
10.73k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.72k
8.16k (x0.6)
TOTAL
71.76k
53.19k (x0.74)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
76.69k
30.31k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
104.06k
45.13k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
20.17k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
5.77k (x0.65)
TOTAL
242.81k
101.38k (x0.42)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.25k
14.65k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
23.16k
21.57k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.09k
9.93k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.21k
8.02k (x0.61)
TOTAL
71.7k
54.18k (x0.76)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
77.43k
32.14k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
109.08k
43.54k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.45k
19.58k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
5.61k (x0.64)
TOTAL
247.71k
100.87k (x0.41)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
24.25k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
21.63k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
9.09k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
7.23k (x0.52)
TOTAL
93.54k
62.19k (x0.66)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
56.9k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
55.68k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
19.29k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
6.09k (x0.7)
TOTAL
330.62k
137.96k (x0.42)

Performance/W
i3-12100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4