Core i3-12100F vs Ryzen 9 7950X
Description
The i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7950X is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100F gets a score of 340.5 k points while the 7950X gets 1597.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X is 4.7 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100F gets a score of 340.5 k points while the 7950X gets 1597.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X is 4.7 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
a60f12
Core
Alder Lake-S
Raphael
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM5
Cores/Threads
4/8
16/32
TDP
58 W
170 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
131072 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
88.81k points
121.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
340.49k points
1597.79k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100F
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
39.54k
40.61k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
23.79k
31.82k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
16.63k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.52k
32.28k (x2.39)
TOTAL
88.81k
121.33k (x1.37)
Multithread
i3-12100F
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
148k
683.17k (x4.62)
Test#2 (FP)
123.08k
563.45k (x4.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.73k
286.77k (x5.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.67k
64.4k (x3.86)
TOTAL
340.49k
1597.79k (x4.69)
Performance/W
i3-12100F
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
2552 points/W
4019 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2122 points/W
3314 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
1687 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
379 points/W
TOTAL
5871 points/W
9399 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-12100F
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
9195 points/GHz
7124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/GHz
5582 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2781 points/GHz
2917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3144 points/GHz
5663 points/GHz
TOTAL
20652 points/GHz
21286 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4