Core i3-12100F vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
Description
The i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7940HS is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100F gets a score of 340.5 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 2.1 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100F gets a score of 340.5 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 2.1 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
a70f41
Core
Alder Lake-S
Phoenix
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
58 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2023
Mean monothread perf.
88.81k points
113.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
340.49k points
718.59k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100F
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
39.54k
38.25k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
23.79k
29.92k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
15.5k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.52k
29.89k (x2.21)
TOTAL
88.81k
113.57k (x1.28)
Multithread
i3-12100F
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
148k
309.6k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
123.08k
260.4k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.73k
128.56k (x2.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.67k
20.04k (x1.2)
TOTAL
340.49k
718.59k (x2.11)
Performance/W
i3-12100F
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2552 points/W
8846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2122 points/W
7440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
3673 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
573 points/W
TOTAL
5871 points/W
20531 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-12100F
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
9195 points/GHz
7355 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2781 points/GHz
2981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3144 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
TOTAL
20652 points/GHz
21839 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4