Core i3-12100F vs Ryzen 7 3700X
Description
The i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3700X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100F gets a score of 340.5 k points while the 3700X gets 483.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 1.4 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100F gets a score of 340.5 k points while the 3700X gets 483.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 1.4 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
870f10
Core
Alder Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
58 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2022
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
88.81k points
74.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
340.49k points
483.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100F
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
39.54k
16.77k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
23.79k
26.29k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
8.79k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.52k
22.51k (x1.66)
TOTAL
88.81k
74.35k (x0.84)
Multithread
i3-12100F
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
148k
167.94k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
123.08k
209.85k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.73k
94.41k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.67k
11.27k (x0.68)
TOTAL
340.49k
483.47k (x1.42)
Performance/W
i3-12100F
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2552 points/W
2584 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2122 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
1452 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
5871 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-12100F
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
9195 points/GHz
3811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/GHz
5976 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2781 points/GHz
1997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3144 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
TOTAL
20652 points/GHz
16898 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4