Core i3-12100F vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100F gets a score of 340.5 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.3 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100F gets a score of 340.5 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.3 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
800f82
Core
Alder Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
58 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
88.81k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
340.49k points
431.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100F
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
39.54k
15.34k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
23.79k
25.75k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
5.79k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.52k
17.95k (x1.33)
TOTAL
88.81k
64.83k (x0.73)
Multithread
i3-12100F
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
148k
123.07k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
123.08k
239.3k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.73k
60.6k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.67k
8.18k (x0.49)
TOTAL
340.49k
431.14k (x1.27)
Performance/W
i3-12100F
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2552 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2122 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
5871 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-12100F
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
9195 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2781 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3144 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
20652 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4