| | | | | | |

Core i9-12900HK vs i9-10980XE


Description
The i9-12900HK is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900HK gets a score of 622.8 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 2 times faster than the i9-12900HK. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
50657
Core
Alder Lake-H
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
14/20
18/36
TDP
45 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280/2x2048 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
25344 kB
Date
January 2022
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.43k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
622.83k points
1241.12k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-12900HK
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
30.51k
29.53k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
18.67k
22.59k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
5.99k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.55k
10.22k (x1.07)
TOTAL
68.43k
68.33k (x1)

Multithread

i9-12900HK

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
273.58k
587.06k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
228.21k
496.41k (x2.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.89k
134.66k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
22.99k (x2.51)
TOTAL
622.83k
1241.12k (x1.99)

Performance/W
i9-12900HK
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
6080 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5071 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2486 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
203 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
13841 points/W
7522 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-12900HK
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
6103 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3734 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1938 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1911 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
13686 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4