| | | | | | |

Core i9-12900HK vs i7-8650U


Description
The i9-12900HK is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-8650U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900HK gets a score of 622.8 k points while the i7-8650U gets 173.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900HK is 3.6 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
806ea
Core
Alder Lake-H
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
14/20
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280/2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2022
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
68.43k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
622.83k points
173.49k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-12900HK
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
30.51k
21.61k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
18.67k
19.69k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
4.61k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.55k
9.95k (x1.04)
TOTAL
68.43k
55.86k (x0.82)

Multithread

i9-12900HK

i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
273.58k
78.38k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
228.21k
72.02k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.89k
16.95k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
6.15k (x0.67)
TOTAL
622.83k
173.49k (x0.28)

Performance/W
i9-12900HK
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
6080 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5071 points/W
4802 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2486 points/W
1130 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
203 points/W
410 points/W
TOTAL
13841 points/W
11566 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-12900HK
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
6103 points/GHz
5146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3734 points/GHz
4689 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1938 points/GHz
1097 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1911 points/GHz
2368 points/GHz
TOTAL
13686 points/GHz
13300 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4