| | | | | | |

Core i9-12900HK vs i5-10600K


Description
The i9-12900HK is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900HK gets a score of 622.8 k points while the i5-10600K gets 365.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900HK is 1.7 times faster than the i5-10600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
a0655
Core
Alder Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
14/20
6/12
TDP
45 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280/2x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.43k points
74.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
622.83k points
365.67k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-12900HK
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
30.51k
30.27k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
18.67k
26.42k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
6.07k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.55k
11.33k (x1.19)
TOTAL
68.43k
74.09k (x1.08)

Multithread

i9-12900HK

i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
273.58k
164.69k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
228.21k
156.45k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.89k
37.39k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
7.15k (x0.78)
TOTAL
622.83k
365.67k (x0.59)

Performance/W
i9-12900HK
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
6080 points/W
1317 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5071 points/W
1252 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2486 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
203 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
13841 points/W
2925 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-12900HK
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
6103 points/GHz
6306 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3734 points/GHz
5505 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1938 points/GHz
1264 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1911 points/GHz
2361 points/GHz
TOTAL
13686 points/GHz
15436 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4