| | | | | | |

Core i9-12900HK vs Ryzen 9 7940HS


Description
The i9-12900HK is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7940HS is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900HK gets a score of 622.8 k points while the 7940HS gets 678.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.1 times faster than the i9-12900HK. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
a70f41
Core
Alder Lake-H
Phoenix
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
14/20
8/16
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280/2x2048 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2023
Mean monothread perf.
68.43k points
107.71k points
Mean multithread perf.
622.83k points
678.46k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-12900HK
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
30.51k
37.07k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
18.67k
29.49k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
14.86k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.55k
26.29k (x2.75)
TOTAL
68.43k
107.71k (x1.57)

Multithread

i9-12900HK

7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
273.58k
286.22k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
228.21k
254.32k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.89k
123.23k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
14.69k (x1.61)
TOTAL
622.83k
678.46k (x1.09)

Performance/W
i9-12900HK
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6080 points/W
8178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5071 points/W
7266 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2486 points/W
3521 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
203 points/W
420 points/W
TOTAL
13841 points/W
19385 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-12900HK
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6103 points/GHz
7129 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3734 points/GHz
5671 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1938 points/GHz
2858 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1911 points/GHz
5055 points/GHz
TOTAL
13686 points/GHz
20713 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4