Core i9-12900HK vs Ryzen 3 1200
Description
The i9-12900HK is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 1200 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900HK gets a score of 622.8 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-12900HK is 5.3 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900HK gets a score of 622.8 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-12900HK is 5.3 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
800f11
Core
Alder Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
AM4
Cores/Threads
14/20
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280/2x2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2022
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
68.43k points
37.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
622.83k points
117.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-12900HK
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
30.51k
11.73k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
18.67k
18.85k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
4.22k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.55k
2.76k (x0.29)
TOTAL
68.43k
37.55k (x0.55)
Multithread
i9-12900HK
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
273.58k
38.56k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
228.21k
62.21k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.89k
13.7k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
3.33k (x0.36)
TOTAL
622.83k
117.81k (x0.19)
Performance/W
i9-12900HK
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
6080 points/W
593 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5071 points/W
957 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2486 points/W
211 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
203 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
13841 points/W
1812 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-12900HK
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
6103 points/GHz
3449 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3734 points/GHz
5544 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1938 points/GHz
1242 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1911 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
13686 points/GHz
11045 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4