| | | | | | |

Core i7-1280P vs i9-13900HX


Description
The i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 468.3 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 877.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 1.9 times faster than the i7-1280P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
b0671
Core
Alder Lake-P
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
14/20
24/32
TDP
28 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
36864 kB
Date
April 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
91.45k points
104.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
468.3k points
877.5k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
22.72k
28.5k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
23.88k
29.03k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.75k
11.57k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.71k
14.71k (x1.07)
TOTAL
73.05k
83.8k (x1.15)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
151.95k
196.13k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
160.95k
222.91k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.9k
129.21k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.91k
24.26k (x1.53)
TOTAL
413.72k
572.52k (x1.38)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
39.78k
49.8k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
26.06k
26.07k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
13.65k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.17k
15.38k (x1.17)
TOTAL
91.45k
104.9k (x1.15)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
209.96k
375.69k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
170.21k
329.21k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.04k
157.71k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
14.89k (x0.93)
TOTAL
468.3k
877.5k (x1.87)

Performance/W
i7-1280P
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
7499 points/W
6831 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6079 points/W
5986 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2573 points/W
2867 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
575 points/W
271 points/W
TOTAL
16725 points/W
15955 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1280P
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
8287 points/GHz
9222 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/GHz
4828 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2744 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
19051 points/GHz
19427 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4