| | | | | | |

Core i7-12700H vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 685.5 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 2 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
306f2
Core
Alder Lake-H
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
14/20
8/16
TDP
115 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
96.4k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
685.54k points
343.64k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-12700H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
25.81k
13.1k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
26.18k
11.91k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.71k
4.83k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
3.83k (x0.28)
TOTAL
80.58k
33.68k (x0.42)

Multithread

i7-12700H

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
203.61k
105.42k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
249.64k
109.99k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
101.32k
44.56k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.55k
17.7k (x1.85)
TOTAL
564.12k
277.66k (x0.49)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12700H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
42.82k
20.99k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
26.51k
11.9k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.74k
4.72k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.33k
3.75k (x0.28)
TOTAL
96.4k
41.36k (x0.43)

Multithread

i7-12700H

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
298.78k
172.62k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
256.21k
110.03k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.3k
44.06k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.25k
16.93k (x0.98)
TOTAL
685.54k
343.64k (x0.5)

Performance/W
i7-12700H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2598 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2228 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
985 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
150 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
5961 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-12700H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
9110 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5641 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2923 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2836 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
20511 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4