| | | | | | |

Core i7-12700H vs i5-10400F


Description
The i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 685.5 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 1.8 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
a0655
Core
Alder Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
14/20
6/12
TDP
115 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16386 kB
Date
January 2022
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
96.4k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
685.54k points
390.78k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12700H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
42.82k
28.39k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
26.51k
24.89k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.74k
5.78k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.33k
13.19k (x0.99)
TOTAL
96.4k
72.25k (x0.75)

Multithread

i7-12700H

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
298.78k
180.2k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
256.21k
163.51k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.3k
40.6k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.25k
6.48k (x0.38)
TOTAL
685.54k
390.78k (x0.57)

Performance/W
i7-12700H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2598 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2228 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
985 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
150 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
5961 points/W
6012 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-12700H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
9110 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5641 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2923 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2836 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
20511 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4