Core i7-12700H vs i5-12400F
Description
Both models i7-12700H and i5-12400F are based on Alder Lake architecture.
Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 685.5 k points while the i5-12400F gets 488 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 1.4 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 685.5 k points while the i5-12400F gets 488 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 1.4 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
90672
Core
Alder Lake-H
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
14/20
6/12
TDP
115 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
96.4k points
87.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
685.54k points
488.01k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12700H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
42.82k
38.79k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
26.51k
23.73k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.74k
11.95k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.33k
13.41k (x1.01)
TOTAL
96.4k
87.88k (x0.91)
Multithread
i7-12700H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
298.78k
203.66k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
256.21k
182.98k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.3k
83.88k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.25k
17.49k (x1.01)
TOTAL
685.54k
488.01k (x0.71)
Performance/W
i7-12700H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2598 points/W
3133 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2228 points/W
2815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
985 points/W
1290 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
150 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
5961 points/W
7508 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-12700H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
9110 points/GHz
8815 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5641 points/GHz
5394 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2923 points/GHz
2715 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2836 points/GHz
3048 points/GHz
TOTAL
20511 points/GHz
19972 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4