Core i5-12400 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7950X3D is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 552.6 k points while the 7950X3D gets 1659.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 3 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 552.6 k points while the 7950X3D gets 1659.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 3 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
a60f12
Core
Arder Lake-S
Raphael
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM5
Cores/Threads
6/12
16/32
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
131072 kB
Date
January 2022
February 2023
Mean monothread perf.
99.72k points
119.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
552.59k points
1659.74k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
46.08k
40.45k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
25.51k
30.77k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.4k
16.33k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.73k
32.18k (x2.18)
TOTAL
99.72k
119.73k (x1.2)
Multithread
i5-12400
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
237.35k
640.26k (x2.7)
Test#2 (FP)
201.2k
525.94k (x2.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.8k
272.59k (x2.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.24k
220.96k (x13.6)
TOTAL
552.59k
1659.74k (x3)
Performance/W
i5-12400
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/W
5335 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3095 points/W
4383 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1505 points/W
2272 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
250 points/W
1841 points/W
TOTAL
8501 points/W
13831 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
10472 points/GHz
7097 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5798 points/GHz
5399 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3046 points/GHz
2864 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3348 points/GHz
5645 points/GHz
TOTAL
22665 points/GHz
21005 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4